Re: Just a ball park estimate -- MIDRANGE-L

Subject: Re: Just a ball park estimate
From: Nathan Andelin <nandelin@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2007 11:45:15 -0700 (PDT)
List-archive: <http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l>
List-help: <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=help>
List-id: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion <midrange-l.midrange.com>
List-post: <mailto:midrange-l@midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

Now load up V5R3 on a 128MB 170 with 73 cpw
and yes you will learn 'SLOW'.

Performance is a hobby for me. I ran a CPU bound benchmark on my 3100 CPW
model 520 and on my 73 CPW model 170. The 520 was 50 times faster.
Nevertheless, I do the majority of my new development on the model 170 at V5R3.

Nathan M. Andelin

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2026 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.