Interactive job adopting priority 89 !! -- MIDRANGE-L

Subject: Interactive job adopting priority 89 !!
From: <c.chambers@xxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 10:23:22 +0100
List-archive: <http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l>
List-help: <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=help>
List-id: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion <midrange-l.midrange.com>
List-post: <mailto:midrange-l@midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

We had a situation whereby all interactive jobs seemed to adopt the
priority of 89 (rather than the default 20 they normally run under) and
all sessions seemed to grind to halt - understandably.

Is this an automatic action taken by OS400 when certain conditions are
met - or do we have a rogue operator changing the priorities ?

Ideas??

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

Follow-Ups:

Re: Interactive job adopting priority 89 !! , Al Barsa
Re: Interactive job adopting priority 89 !! , ChadB
Re: Interactive job adopting priority 89 !! , Crispin Bates
RE: Interactive job adopting priority 89 !! , Paul Nelson

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.