I lack the experience of others on this list to know best techniques, I just know what I would do based on what I know how to do, which may be far from best approach from performance perspective.

We do have BPCS ... HPH HPO are the main files for us, but this may be BPCS version specific. I am also more active on BPCS-L than I am on MIDRANGE-L.

Don't all your suppliers want to know when a PO is created against their vendor number?

We print our POs, so we have a hard copy for our records, then fax to ALL suppliers. Printed on the PO is request for reply within 1 business day confirming the PO.
Most confirmations come with changes to date they can deliver, price, other stuff.

A related issue is when a PO gets updated ... does the supplier need want to see the revised version? I believe that if all we are doing is updating PO to agree with their corrections, they probably not need to see another copy, but when the change is to add more item lines, change in what we want to receive, then they do need revised copy.

Any time a PO gets updated or created, there is a flag that goes on in the PO saying that it needs to be printed, then when the option is taken to print POs, all that have thaf flag get printed. This can be a bit disconcerting when you got more than one person creating, updating POs. The person, who does the print option first, gets all the POs so far that "belong" to both persons who were creating them.

You don't need a trigger to add something to a job stream. Assuming you run PUR520C to print all POs added or changed since last time you run PUR520C, you can have PUR520C call an extra CL to generate whatever you want that is special for that one vendor #. If you do not want that vendor # to get the regular POs printed that go to all the vendors by default, then have your called CL turn off the print PO flag.

Another delivery method is FTP, which can go from any kind of computer to any kind of computer (your vendor does not need to have a 400/iSeries) ... be sure to support multiple members at the receiving end, or whatever the non-400 equivalent is, so they can extract what you sent, and clear what they used, not have to process the data right after they get it.

You don't need to read entire data base to see if that vendor # has a record with the print flag on. You can have a logical over the physical file that is only interested in the records for that vendor that have the PO print flag on.

I guess one issue is work habits of your people. We have got people who sign onto ORD500 etc. at start of their work day, and they still on same program 2/3 of day later. If you got people doing that with PUR500, then having your intercept program kick in at end of any PUR500 session might not be good enough. There's also the issue of flakey connections, where a PC goes down in middle of running some program ... you mgit never get to the end point.

We have modified our PUR520C only to the extent of "tailoring" the printed PO to the way our people want it to appear. (PC printer friendly, with various our company contact info top and bottom).
We have modified our PUR300 (PO inquiry) onlyt to the extent of making the vendor phone # in plain sight.
We have seriously modified & added to reports about what's going on with POs.

I should think that depending on how often each day you want to run the print job, modify that job stream to get your alternative notification method for the particular vendor #.

We appear to have vendors for which BPCS is too complex for them.
We have "blanket PO's" ... we need certain quantities X weeks out.
They get the PO, agree to supply.
Later, we add to same PO# with more X weeks out of same items.
Vendor acts like we sent them two completely different POs, they double ship the quantities that were on same PO first time and second time.

One of our mfg. outsourcing suppliers would like to know whenever we create/modify a P.O. (BPCS HPH/HPO) against their vendor number.

Although I've never done this, I was wondering if a trigger could be assigned to these files, then at least an email, or email with say a pdf or excel file attachment, would be automatically sent to their company.

Thanks in advance!



Don F. Cavaiani
IT Manager
Amerequip Corp.
920-894-7063

"Only one who devotes himself to a cause with his whole strength and soul can be a true master. For this reason mastery demands all of a person." Albert Einstein



--
This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion (MIDRANGE-L) mailing list
To post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l
or email: MIDRANGE-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
at http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l.



As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.