Short answer: That was the way the application, which I inherited, was
written.
Longer answer: Since I took over the programming chores, I have
externalized "most" of the tables using DDS (though the original
programs are still II, new ones in IV). The original developer (bless
his pea-picking heart) set up the data entry files (which use the S/36
?WS? variable as part of the name) have the same layout as the, say,
order header/line files. In addition, he created intermediate (such as
weekly and monthly) storage areas that, also, have the same layout.
Actually I do have multiple libraries for data, usually by company. Or
other, less sane, reasons. It is, in short, the application, not the
S/36 environment.
Question: That applies to the original question, How?
* Jerry C. Adams
*IBM System i5/iSeries Programmer/Analyst
B&W Wholesale Distributors, Inc.* *
voice
615.995.7024
fax
615.995.1201
email
jerry@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <
mailto:jerry@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
rob@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
I am trying to think of why I would need tables with exactly the same
layout, but different names. It isn't because you are still running in
S/36 mode and, therefore, cannot use multiple libraries to stick your data
in, is it?
Rob Berendt
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact
[javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.