Short answer: That was the way the application, which I inherited, was written.


Longer answer: Since I took over the programming chores, I have externalized "most" of the tables using DDS (though the original programs are still II, new ones in IV). The original developer (bless his pea-picking heart) set up the data entry files (which use the S/36 ?WS? variable as part of the name) have the same layout as the, say, order header/line files. In addition, he created intermediate (such as weekly and monthly) storage areas that, also, have the same layout.

Actually I do have multiple libraries for data, usually by company. Or other, less sane, reasons. It is, in short, the application, not the S/36 environment.

Question: That applies to the original question, How?


* Jerry C. Adams
*IBM System i5/iSeries Programmer/Analyst
B&W Wholesale Distributors, Inc.* *
voice
615.995.7024
fax
615.995.1201
email
jerry@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:jerry@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>



rob@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
I am trying to think of why I would need tables with exactly the same layout, but different names. It isn't because you are still running in S/36 mode and, therefore, cannot use multiple libraries to stick your data in, is it?

Rob Berendt


As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Follow-Ups:
Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.