Short answer: That was the way the application, which I inherited, was
written.
Longer answer: Since I took over the programming chores, I have
externalized "most" of the tables using DDS (though the original
programs are still II, new ones in IV). The original developer (bless
his pea-picking heart) set up the data entry files (which use the S/36
?WS? variable as part of the name) have the same layout as the, say,
order header/line files. In addition, he created intermediate (such as
weekly and monthly) storage areas that, also, have the same layout.
Actually I do have multiple libraries for data, usually by company. Or
other, less sane, reasons. It is, in short, the application, not the
S/36 environment.
Question: That applies to the original question, How?
* Jerry C. Adams
*IBM System i5/iSeries Programmer/Analyst
B&W Wholesale Distributors, Inc.* *
voice
615.995.7024
fax
615.995.1201
email
jerry@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <
mailto:jerry@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
rob@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
I am trying to think of why I would need tables with exactly the same
layout, but different names. It isn't because you are still running in
S/36 mode and, therefore, cannot use multiple libraries to stick your data
in, is it?
Rob Berendt
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2026 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact
[javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.