FWiW: Using token CPF3025 as keyword for a search would pick up any
'conversational' references to that message identifier. As a "symptom"
the message is [or at least should be] recorded as msgCPF3025. The
APAR/PTF that will be found using the kwd CPF3025 is a minimalist change
that is on C5298530 [cumulative 2005.298 v5r3m0]; the PTF will prevent
only a specific case of that message. Searching on the symptom would
find another PTF which intends to be _the_ fix for RCVF against a DDMF
receiving that unexpected message issued F/QCLDMIO [from program
QCLDMIO; again, in symptom kwd form, prevents finding 'conversational'
references to that program name].
Perhaps such a tidbit is of use for those searching for a fix to a
problem.
Regards, Chuck
-- All comments provided "as is" with no warranties of any kind
whatsoever and may not represent positions, strategies, nor views of my
employer
rob@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
Went to http://www.ibm.com
In the search I entered CPF3025.
Got one, and only one hit. Probably not related. Something about needing
a PTF on V5R3 with RCVF and DDMF, and the ptf number to fix it.
Rob Berendt
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2025 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact
[javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.