FWiW: Using token CPF3025 as keyword for a search would pick up any
'conversational' references to that message identifier. As a "symptom"
the message is [or at least should be] recorded as msgCPF3025. The
APAR/PTF that will be found using the kwd CPF3025 is a minimalist change
that is on C5298530 [cumulative 2005.298 v5r3m0]; the PTF will prevent
only a specific case of that message. Searching on the symptom would
find another PTF which intends to be _the_ fix for RCVF against a DDMF
receiving that unexpected message issued F/QCLDMIO [from program
QCLDMIO; again, in symptom kwd form, prevents finding 'conversational'
references to that program name].
Perhaps such a tidbit is of use for those searching for a fix to a
problem.
Regards, Chuck
-- All comments provided "as is" with no warranties of any kind
whatsoever and may not represent positions, strategies, nor views of my
employer
rob@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
Went to http://www.ibm.com
In the search I entered CPF3025.
Got one, and only one hit. Probably not related. Something about needing
a PTF on V5R3 with RCVF and DDMF, and the ptf number to fix it.
Rob Berendt
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2026 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact
[javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.