RE: Console replacement strategy

["Evan Harris" <spanner@xxxxxxxxxx>]

Hi Pete

Once you get used to a HMC you will never want to give away the
functionality it offers. I'd also be willing to say it was as bullet proof
as twinax - which I wouldn't say about either LAN or Direct attach console.

I have one customer that installed it using an existing KVM they had. While
I find it awkward and a pain to use this way it works fine (though it would
not be my preference).

The only thing it doesn't do is change tapes and CD's.

If you are seriously investigating this on your customers behalf, get a
decent look at one and get a reasonable trial. The extra money is well
spent.

Regards
Evan Harris

> -----Original Message-----
> From: midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:midrange-l-
> bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Pete Helgren
> Sent: Friday, 13 July 2007 5:59 a.m.
> To: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion
> Subject: Console replacement strategy
>
> I have a customer that had a 5250 twinax console which about a year ago
> we replaced.  They wanted something that was "more modern". After doing
> some research I settled on a unit by Visara which we installed at the
> customer.  At this point, a year later, we are again looking at
> something to replace the console (the Visara unit - don't ask).  I have
> followed various threads over the past year about thin consoles and,
> more recently, an HMC. I'd like some feedback on what the best approach
> would be to make this a closely bullet-proof as the good 'ol twinax
> terminal was.
>
> The requirements are: This will be on a KVM. The console must be VERY
> simple to use: diagnostics, rebooting (if needed), starting the 5250
> session (if needed) need to be so simple a child could do it. The
> keyboard layout should be such that it make it easy for them to
> transition between PC sessions and 5250 console.  I am leaning toward
> handling a remote access requirement by getting an IP based KVM that I
> can use to get to them over the Internet with since there is an IXA and
> an IXS on this 520 that I would like to access as well.
>
> Any opinions on what the best overall solution would be?
>
> Pete