Re: Complete re-vamp of IBM. No more System i division. -- MIDRANGE-L

Subject: Re: Complete re-vamp of IBM. No more System i division.
From: Nathan Andelin <nandelin@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2007 13:02:26 -0700 (PDT)
List-archive: <http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l>
List-help: <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=help>
List-id: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion <midrange-l.midrange.com>
List-post: <mailto:midrange-l@midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

How does a brand survive when it reports to two separate
business units?

It doesn't appear to me that IBM cares much whether i, p, and x brands survive, but rather brands like Power, Websphere, Rational, and Tivoli.

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.