re: Cumes and Hipers and Groups, oh my! -- MIDRANGE-L

Subject: re: Cumes and Hipers and Groups, oh my!
From: Jim Oberholtzer <joberholtzer@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2007 10:35:54 -0500
List-archive: <http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l>
List-help: <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=help>
List-id: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion <midrange-l.midrange.com>
List-post: <mailto:midrange-l@midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

<snip>

It seems strange to me that the cume is coming on all completely full ISO
images of exactly 675MB, while the groups are coming on varying sizes. Of
course, the naming is different so I can guess they're probably built by
slightly different processes, but I was wondering if anybody has come across
this?

</snip>

Joe,
This is completely normal. Load up the image catalogs and let 'em rip. Remember to use binary transfers when moving the files onto your System i......

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

Follow-Ups:

RE: Cumes and Hipers and Groups, oh my! , Joe Pluta

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2025 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.