I do not own one... yet. But...
To make the system into a development system should not require such
upgrades.? Maybe if also intended to be used as some kind of limited
benchmark, performance, acceptance test, or proof of concept system?
The system has full CPU, which in my experience is what compilers use
most. That is, the compilers are not usually resource intensive for
either disk or memory. So although the limits on the capable CPW rating
due to limitations on features other than CPU could play a role in some
cases, I expect that some real life experience may find some variations
on the proposed setup by the OP to be quite acceptable. I would always
get as much memory as /affordable/; that would be my preferred variation
on the originally described setup.
And with the licensing change to concurrent users, with two twelve
hour or three eight hour divisions of a day, the five users could enable
cost sharing across closer to ten or fifteen people. Of course getting
ten versus five people, across varied limited or fixed hours, to get the
cost back down, seems already to complicate the original case -- but
that did not include ongoing maintenance charges which start ?3 months? in?
Maybe somebody has an actual experience they will share, about their
use of such a system only for development. Maybe the lease too.
Regards, Chuck
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact
[javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.