Re: 515 - 525 side by side comparison -- MIDRANGE-L

Subject: Re: 515 - 525 side by side comparison
From: Pete Helgren <Pete@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2007 14:03:30 -0600
List-archive: <http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l>
List-help: <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=help>
List-id: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion <midrange-l.midrange.com>
List-post: <mailto:midrange-l@midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

As Crispin said, that has fortunately been removed and if there is no need for external expansion (for drives, etc) , then the only compelling reason to get the 525 is capacity on demand or memory upgrades beyond 16GB. The elimination of the user maximum made the choice between the 515 and 525 a bit more dicey.

Pete

Lukas Beeler wrote:

On 10/25/07, Pete Helgren <Pete@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

applications running. You don't need LPARs and the user population
might grow to 45 or so in the next 3 years.

Looks like the decision is already made for you. The maximum user
count on the 515 is 40.

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.