|
-----Original Message-----
From: midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Joe Pluta
Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2007 11:40 AM
To: 'Midrange Systems Technical Discussion'
Subject: RE: Separation of Duties...
From: Wilt, Charles
Lastly, perhaps you could consider the Service Tools QSECOFR ID the
"system Admin" and the regular QSECOFR ID as the "Database Admin".
Oooo, I like this Charles. It probably wouldn't clear a
common sense check, because you don't need SST for purely
sysadmin jobs like backup and recovery, but it IS required
for the hardware stuff that you have to typically do on
Windows machines and that you rarely have to worry about on
the System i.
But then again, a LOT of auditing is not about common sense.
Trying to create common admin roles for the System i and a
Windows box is sort of like trying to create a common
driver's manual for a Mopar and a moped. So you might get
away with it.
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.