The old saying was "no one ever got fired for using IBM". Probably not so
true anymore. However, that being said, a good security consultant should
be able to give you a firm end to end check. For example, we're using
IBM's Managed Security Services to do benevolent hacking, etc. Ask
yourself this, would one of the other i5 consultants mentioned ever
suggest you upgrade the level of DNS being served from your i5 because
there are known leaks with that level of bind and you should be at a newer
level of bind? To the point that we had to put them, and the i5/os
people, in a ring to duke it out because the i5 people said that didn't
apply with their version. MSS won.

On the low end of the spectrum is using one of the accounting firms out
there to do your i5 security. They are stuck with the same old format of
questions from 20 years ago, like QLMTDEVSSN. Jeepers, why limit someone
to one 5250 session and allow them to connect 27 ways with ODBC, etc?

Rob Berendt

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Follow-Ups:
Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.