Re: WRKACTJOB still a resource pig? -- MIDRANGE-L

Subject: Re: WRKACTJOB still a resource pig?
From: Dan <dan27649@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 28 Dec 2007 12:52:03 -0500
List-archive: <http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l>
List-help: <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=help>
List-id: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion <midrange-l.midrange.com>
List-post: <mailto:midrange-l@midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

On Dec 28, 2007 12:33 PM, <rob@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

If so, then will WRKSBSJOB QBATCH work for you and get
Mordac off of your back?

Just saw this again, and, yes, I believe this is actually a better solution,
because the main production job spawns off other batch jobs, and it would be
easier to see them all on one screen, instead of having to page through
WRKACTJOB to find all of the spawned jobs!

Of course, it wouldn't surprise me if WRKSBSJOB also triggers this admin's
ire. Not that I really care anymore, but anything that keeps him off my
back is a welcome thing.

Thanks Rob!

- Dan

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

Follow-Ups:

Re: WRKACTJOB still a resource pig? , Dave Boettcher
Re: WRKACTJOB still a resource pig? , rob

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.