RE: Reason not to go to V6R1

["Joe Pluta" <joepluta@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

> From: rob@xxxxxxxxx
>
> Granted, with one of the main goals of
> V6R1 to be the killer of FAST/400 (and that genre) the odds are high that
> WRKDBF probably now uses some techniques that V6R1 would slay and it would
> take some serious rewrites of WRKDBF, even if they did give out the
> source.

I'm not so sure of that, Rob.  Bill's code was pretty straightforward (in
fact, I read recently a lot was generated).  About the only thing that might
cause problems is the undelete, which originally used the old UNDEL code
which indeed did some magic under the covers, but I think someone has
created a V6R1 compatible UNDEL that might work in its place.  Either that,
or just remove the UNDEL capability entirely; I can't tell you the last time
I used undelete, but I use the other features of WRKDBF all the time.

Joe