Re: QTEMP not in library list

[Jerry Adams <jerry@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

True, and I should have mentioned that possibility.  But I only do that 
for files that are outside of the current ?FLIB?.  And then I'll put 
those in a CL so that qualification (Test or Production) can be 
determined more easily.

	* Jerry C. Adams
*IBM System i Programmer/Analyst
B&W Wholesale Distributors, Inc.* *
voice
	615.995.7024
fax
	615.995.1201
email
	jerry@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:jerry@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>



ed stevens wrote:
> An OVRDBF before the // FILE statement can be used to qualify the library in the 36EE.
>
> message: 3
> date: Fri, 11 Jan 2008 07:47:49 -0600
> from: Jerry Adams <jerry@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> subject: Re: QTEMP not in library list
>
> There are some places where one cannot qualify the library, such as the 
> 36EE (although it does have the FLIB command).  In a test environment 
> (single LPAR, multiple libraries - test/production) using the library 
> list is pretty much a "must have" for many situations.  But I can still 
> do explicit overrides because I know if I am running in a test -vs- 
> production mode.  But the programs (CALL's) I usually leave to the 
> library list.  Only the tables, data areas, etc., get qualified.  
> Naturally, there are always exceptions to the rule .-)
>
>     * Jerry C. Adams
> *IBM System i Programmer/Analyst
> B&W Wholesale Distributors, Inc.* *
> voice
>     615.995.7024
> fax
>     615.995.1201
> email
>     jerry@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:jerry@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
>
>
> Jeff Crosby wrote:
>   
> > Crispin,
> >
> > You took the words right out of my mouth.  If the library is always
> > explicitly coded, why have the library list at all?
> >
> >
> >     
>
>
>       ____________________________________________________________________________________
> Be a better friend, newshound, and 
> know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile.  Try it now.  http://mobile.yahoo.com/;_ylt=Ahu06i62sR8HDtDypao8Wcj9tAcJ 
>
>