RE: QTEMP not in library list

["Crispin" <cbates@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

-----Original Message-----
From: midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Scott Klement
Sent: Sunday, January 13, 2008 5:31 PM
To: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion
Subject: Re: QTEMP not in library list

> > IMHO, it would be a very odd case where you'd want an application to 
> > refer to QTEMP when it normally refers to a production library.  In 
> > fact, I'd wager it's a programmer trying to test code.

Scott, that's certainly not the case, and you've lost your wager. 

> > Let's face it, folks... the only reason QTEMP needs to be in the library
> > list (aside from adding it on-the-fly for testing code) is because of all
> > the poorly written software out there.  In this market space, poorly
> > written software absolutely ABOUNDS -- or, at least, that's been my
> > experience.

Time to give up, I guess, and go back to writing poor software...