Re: Thin console - Caution! -- MIDRANGE-L

Subject: Re: Thin console - Caution!
From: "Lukas Beeler" <lukas.beeler@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2008 20:51:16 +0100
List-archive: <http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l>
List-help: <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=help>
List-id: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion <midrange-l.midrange.com>
List-post: <mailto:midrange-l@midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

On Wed, Feb 20, 2008 at 8:38 PM, <rob@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Perhaps you need to migrate to a S/38 if you like that sort of console.
Me, I much prefer the HMC over having to stand at the machine. Besides,
it would look all rather silly on a multiple LPAR machine.

There is some sense in what Walden says. For a single LPAR 515, the
ThinConsole is a needlessly complicated solution.

Operations Console is even worse.

Of course i would love to ship every system with a HMC, but explaining
basic HMC operations to a 50 year old financial guy - this would be
interesting ;)

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

Follow-Ups:

Re: Thin console - Caution! , rob

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.