Re: Calling names - was: Marketing the platform

[Trevor Perry <trevor@xxxxxxxxxx>]

Booth,

Joe is arguing two separate things. Don't get caught in that misdirection.

Did you actually not read what I wrote in that email, either? IBM switched
out the name for the hardware server component from System i5 to System i
somewhere in April or so 2007. At the time they did that, the name "System
i" was already being used by IBM to define the platform, so changing the
server name had no impact on the brand name being used.

FWIW, I am not about the "right" name, just the ONE name for our world. The
one name that IBM uses has been System i from 2006, and late last year, they
started using i5/OS more and more. That part is easy, and if you want to go
back and read every word I wrote, you will see that.

Unless you want to use the wrong email in the wrong argument, then ignore
that you did. 

Trevor


On 2/22/08 12:50 PM, "Booth Martin" <booth@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> What is hugely significant Joe is not whether or not Trevor got it right.
>
> But rather that he, the *Main Champion* of the new names has himself
> become confused.  If Trevor can;t keep it straight, what possible chance
> do the rest of us have?
>
>
>
> Joe Pluta wrote:
> > Trevor Perry wrote:
> >   
> > > > It appears that there WAS a recent change to the name of the servers.
> > > > Checking the announcements in April and in July, the 5 is missing from i5.
> > > > The new servers are now System i servers. I will check further to determine
> > > > how that fits the brand, etc..
> > > >     
> > > >       
> > > Where does it say to use i5?
> > >     a) If it does not, you lie.
> > >     b) If it does, then you did not lie in this case.
> > > It does not.
> > >
> > >   
> > >     
> > http://www.angustheitchap.com/Angus/Blog/12694240-6EEA-4A39-8677-4B56D176C3E8
> > .html
> >
> > Trevor in 2006:
> >
> >  - AS/400 introduced in 1988
> >  - eServer iSeries in 2000
> >  - IBM System i5 in 2006
> >
> > Trevor in 2008:
> >
> >  Server:
> >  1988 AS/400
> >  2000 iSeries
> >  2006 System i
> >
> >
> > This is so you.  You drop the "5", because it doesn't fit your current
> > argument, but there it is, on your own damned blog.  You can't even stay
> > consistent with yourself.
> >
> > Go ahead, call me a liar.  I actually begin to enjoy this, in a weird
> > Squidbillies sort of way.
> >
> > Joe
> >