RE: Woes on ANZOBJCVN... -- MIDRANGE-L

Subject: RE: Woes on ANZOBJCVN...
From: PaulMmn <PaulMmn@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 3 Mar 2008 08:42:36 -0500
List-archive: <http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l>
List-help: <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=help>
List-id: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion <midrange-l.midrange.com>
List-post: <mailto:midrange-l@midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

My take on this is that software vendors don't want you to un-compile their CLP, and with observability no longer 100% removable, there's not much to keep us from moving to new OSs or hardware... a program compiled to v4r5 can still have observability removed so that migration isn't possible without their help... and additional charges!

--Paul E Musselman
PaulMmn@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

Follow-Ups:

RE: Woes on ANZOBJCVN... , Vernon Hamberg

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.