Re: ANZOBJCVN Experience -- MIDRANGE-L

Subject: Re: ANZOBJCVN Experience
From: rob@xxxxxxxxx
Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2008 09:37:32 -0400
List-archive: <http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l>
List-help: <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=help>
List-id: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion <midrange-l.midrange.com>
List-post: <mailto:midrange-l@midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

Joe,

I get your point that ANZOBJCVN should not be the only point you look at
before moving to V6R1.
However I still don't minimize it. I am still waiting on a plug in to
Turnover. Apparently there's a little squabble going on between Unicom
(Softlanding) and the people who wrote the plug in for AS/SET (and
compiled it down to V4R5 with no observability and provided no source).

"When the bull elephants fight, the grass gets trampled."

Rob Berendt

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

Follow-Ups:

Re: ANZOBJCVN Experience , Joe Pluta

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2025 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.