RE: Are we insane? Unique use of native DB2 -- MIDRANGE-L

Subject: RE: Are we insane? Unique use of native DB2
From: "Alan Campin" <Alan.Campin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2008 10:15:59 -0700
List-archive: <http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l>
List-help: <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=help>
List-id: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion <midrange-l.midrange.com>
List-post: <mailto:midrange-l@midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

<snip>
Many LFs each with an access path attached is bad and you are right,
before the days of the system automatically sharing an access path you
could kill a system real easy doing what we are doing but shared access
path has taken care of that.
</snip>

I started out on about Release 3 of the System 38 and it was sharing
access automatically going back that far. I suspect it was in there from
the beginning.

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

Follow-Ups:

Re: Are we insane? Unique use of native DB2 , Crispin Bates

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.