There is no valid reason that I'm aware of.
In fact, I think that latter statement should run slightly faster.

I'm guessing what happened is probably that access plan built by the query
optimizer differs for the two statements and it's saved somewhere (program,
package, plan cache), so you're best off forcing a one-time access plan
rebuild for the latter statement (there is a QAQQINI option to effect this).

Other than that, I'd suggest contacting IBM and reporting this little oddity
as a defect.

HTH, Elvis

Celebrating 11-Years of SQL Performance Excellence on IBM i5/OS and OS/400
www.centerfieldtechnology.com


-----Original Message-----
Subject: sql performance question

Why would the last of the following two SQL statements run ten times
slower than the other?


SELECT *
FROM BLORDLP A
JOIN BLORDDP B
ON ODORD# = OLORD#
AND ODLINE = OLLINE
WHERE OLSTTS <> ODSTTS


SELECT ODORD#, ODLINE, ODSTTS, OLSTTS
FROM BLORDLP A
JOIN BLORDDP B
ON ODORD# = OLORD#
AND ODLINE = OLLINE
WHERE OLSTTS <> ODSTTS

The only difference being the first selects all fields and runs
immediately, the second only selects 4 fields and takes forever to
run.

thanks,

rick


As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Follow-Ups:
Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.