Re: Installing running applications as QSECOFR -- MIDRANGE-L

Subject: Re: Installing running applications as QSECOFR
From: Joe Pluta <joepluta@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 01 Apr 2008 17:13:14 -0500
List-archive: <http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l>
List-help: <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=help>
List-id: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion <midrange-l.midrange.com>
List-post: <mailto:midrange-l@midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

Joe Pluta wrote:

Done this way, you would not need QSECOFR on installation, nor would you ever need to specifically switch to QSECOFR.

(That is, when managing non-QSECOFR objects. You would need to log on with QSECOFR or a QSECOFR surrogate to manage QSECOFR-owned objects. But for application objects, you wouldn't need QSECOFR rights.)

Joe

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

Follow-Ups:

Re: Installing running applications as QSECOFR , David Gibbs

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.