Mike Cunningham wrote:
Wouldn't this flow better if you started with program "S" which asked
the user what they wanted to do, then call "M" to do that work and
return to "S" which sends the user the status message? "M" would
never need to access the display file, only "S" would need to do
that. "M" could be reused from other places and as a batch job since
it never needs to interact with the user

It would if executing the operation specified in "S" were all that "M" did. Unfortunately, "M" is the core program of the application (extremely interactive, using both conventional display file records and a user-defined data stream), while "S" is simply an auxiliary prompting program for the one function.


As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.