RE: Will the next IPL be an abnormal IPL? -- MIDRANGE-L

Subject: RE: Will the next IPL be an abnormal IPL?
From: Sue Baker <smbaker@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2008 18:25:39 +0000 (UTC)
List-archive: <http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l>
List-help: <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=help>
List-id: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion <midrange-l.midrange.com>
List-post: <mailto:midrange-l@midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

Walden H. Leverich wrote on Thu, 10 Apr 2008 21:49:01 GMT:

Which behaviour? That an ENDJOBABN will cause the next IPL to

abnormal?

Sorry for being unclear.... ENDJOBABN will still flag the next
IPL as abnormal, but PTFs should be applied if you've specified
that in an APYPTF command.

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

Follow-Ups:

RE: Will the next IPL be an abnormal IPL? , rob

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.