Supported configurations (was: Second ASP at a remote location)

["Lukas Beeler" <lukas.beeler@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On Mon, Apr 21, 2008 at 9:02 PM, Pete Massiello
<pmassiello-ml@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>         Just because your core application vendor doesn't support tape
>  encryption, doesn't mean you can't use it.  We have installed LTO-4

Yes, because running unsupported configurations has always been an
excellent idea on business critical systems. Just doing something
because you think you can get away with it doesn't mean you should do
it. While doing some slight out of spec modifications on your home
systems doesn't mean that you should put your entire business in
danger by running unsupported configurations.