No. My difficulty is with Aldon specifying the replacement value &LIB in
command creation parameters. If I could set the PRDLIB, I could also set
the Rexx procedure library. I generally prefer using the current library
as it reverts to its previous value after the command ends.

I am following up with Aldon but wanted to explore other possibilities.
Good idea with the product library.

At one time I thought that the command processor would look in the
library containing the command to find the processing program.

Loyd Goodbar
Business Systems
BorgWarner Shared Services
662-473-5713

-----Original Message-----
From: midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of James Lampert
Sent: Monday, April 21, 2008 3:46 PM
To: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion
Subject: Re: Resolving to REXX procedures

lgoodbar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:

Other than hard coding the REXX procedure library in the command, is
there a way to work around this? I seem to recall my change management
system (Aldon) has some difficulty with specifying compile options
(&LIB
not allowed for parameter REXSRCFILE and such). I'll bug them about
this
also.

Does the command have a "product library" set?


As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.