HA Journal Performance - Option 42 of 5722SS1 -- MIDRANGE-L

Subject: HA Journal Performance - Option 42 of 5722SS1
From: "Glenn Birnbaum" <gbirnba@xxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2008 11:22:11 -0700
List-archive: <http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l>
List-help: <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=help>
List-id: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion <midrange-l.midrange.com>
List-post: <mailto:midrange-l@midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

Hi -

We are considering installing option 42 of OS/400, HA Journal
Performance. Our question is whether there is any risk in doing this.
Could installing and using the Journal Caching for our busy production
journals have any downside?

I know that if we have an unplanned outage we can, and probably would,
lose some transactions, but we are willing to take that risk.

TIA,
Glenn Birnbaum

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

Follow-Ups:

RE: HA Journal Performance - Option 42 of 5722SS1 , Elvis Budimlic

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2025 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.