Why not 535? -- MIDRANGE-L

Subject: Why not 535?
From: rob@xxxxxxxxx
Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2008 16:09:09 -0400
List-archive: <http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l>
List-help: <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=help>
List-id: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion <midrange-l.midrange.com>
List-post: <mailto:midrange-l@midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

A poster earlier today said he wanted to start out his 170 at 530. If
there's ever a chance in the future that he may take that 170 and go to
newer hardware shouldn't he go to 535 instead of 530? Speaking as a guy
who took a 270 to 545 and then to a M25 and then upgraded the M25 from 545
to 610.

Rob Berendt

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

Follow-Ups:

RE: Why not 535? , Evan Harris

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.