Re: load source concurrent maintenance

[Joe Pluta <joepluta@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

rob@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
> You did say "long-term".  End of life for the 270 is V5R4M5 anyway.  We 
> upgraded our 270 to V5R4M5, unloaded it to a M25 and upgraded that to 
> V6R1.  Hey, if it can't run the latest I don't even want it for home use.
>   
I use it for V5R4 support.  It can go back to V5R2, and it can run just 
about anything I need for developing multi-tiered applications (there 
just wasn't that much in V6R1 as far as RPG goes).  The next box I get 
for long-term usage will be a V6R2 box... that will be able to compile 
back to the V5R4 box.

And then we'll see if there's a successor to V6R2.

Joe