David Gibbs wrote:
Well, the CPY command doesn't list CPFA09E as an escape message it sends
... perhaps there is a different error that you should trap? I suspect
that CPFA09E is sent as a diagnostic.
Minor note... I no longer know how I ran across it, but I can locate
code where I monitored for and caught CPFA09E from CPY at least as
early as 2001/05. I have a delay-loop that checks again after a
time. It only allows a single retry due to the nature of the
process. I would do it differently if I wrote the entire procedure
today; at the time, it was expected to be replaced.
But why would it work in Job A and not Job B...? Interactive vs.
batch? Different users? Created in Job A so it can be caught in Job
A (or the complement)? Windows user vs. i5/OS user (how is the test
file created)? Different file systems? Is the test directory shared
to the Windows Network? Different systems -- different PTFs?
Sorry, don't know, though I see that it has been resolved by the OP.
I guess my only point here is that the docs that list messages that
can be monitored are not always perfect.
Tom Liotta
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact
[javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.