SQL Performance Question -- MIDRANGE-L

Subject: SQL Performance Question
From: "DebbieKelemen" <DebbieKelemen@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2008 09:53:48 -0600
List-archive: <http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l>
List-help: <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=help>
List-id: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion <midrange-l.midrange.com>
List-post: <mailto:midrange-l@midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

We have some "SQL" processes that were written by our web development team.
They were made into stored procedures on the iSeries. When they run for our
website, they take 15 or 20 seconds, some times more to run. Yet, if we
take the SQL and run it in Navigator, it takes about 450 ms to run.

Any ideas on how to improve the performance of these stored procedures?

I have created the "suggested" indexes and still no improvement.

Debbie Kelemen
Sr. Programmer / Analyst
CHEFS
719-272-2617
dkelemen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
www.chefscatalog.com

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2025 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.