On 18/08/2008, at 5:04 AM, vhamberg@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
All the more reason to abandon remote outq's as much as possible  
and use *LAN devices - those WILL report the pages, I believe.
I thought that was implied by my response but it's always better to  
be explicit. I think you're correct on page reporting for *LAN  
devices but it's been a while since I needed both *LAN and job  
accounting so I can't be sure.
Of course, some printers don't work with devices, but that is  
relatively few, I hope.
Yes, remote output queues should be the choice of last resort, used  
only when stuck with a printer that isn't (or can't be) properly  
recognised as a *LAN device. Ideal of course is to CHOOSE a *LAN  
supported printer before purchasing.
Regards,
Simon Coulter.
--------------------------------------------------------------------
   FlyByNight Software         OS/400, i5/OS Technical Specialists
   
http://www.flybynight.com.au/
   Phone: +61 2 6657 8251   Mobile: +61 0411 091 400        /"\
   Fax:   +61 2 6657 8251                                   \ /
                                                             X
                 ASCII Ribbon campaign against HTML E-Mail  / \
--------------------------------------------------------------------
 
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
	
 
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2025 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact
[javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.