Re: YAIQ - Yet another ignorant question: multiple LPARs. -- MIDRANGE-L

Subject: Re: YAIQ - Yet another ignorant question: multiple LPARs.
From: rob@xxxxxxxxx
Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2008 08:10:08 -0500
List-archive: <http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l>
List-help: <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=help>
List-id: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion <midrange-l.midrange.com>
List-post: <mailto:midrange-l@midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

I was basing that on this statement here:

Same with the z, but physical hardware such as DASD devices can be
updated, safely, by multiple LPARs concurrently. Individual files cannot
be, but z/OS has methods than can ensure that need not happen (OK, the
programmer can get around it, but woe unto him who does it!).

Rob Berendt

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2026 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.