Re: Identifying who deleted records - trigger programs

[James Lampert <jamesl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Milt Habeck wrote:
> Stitch-in-Time overcomes the limitations of the CMJRNIMG command
> which can only look at actual journal entries.  Stitch-in-Time
> software captures key data from journal entries and allows analysis
> on that data whenever you want (e.g. long after journal receivers
> have been detached and deleted).
>
> CMPJRNIMG is record oriented while Stitch-in-Time is field oriented.
> Stitch-in-Time lets you search for the changes you are interested in
> by field(s), with very strong user-defined select/omit criteria. The
> product only reports those changes that fit the criteria. That seems
> like a better idea than wading through pages of cryptic data produced
> by CMJPRNIMG.

<plug> QuestView has been able to display journal entries as if they
were records since February of 2004. </plug>

I added that capability in a futile effort to encourage end-users to 
journal their critical files instead of trying to use QV's own 
rudimentary audit-print capability for S-O auditing, instead of for its 
intended purpose (i.e., oops-recovery).