RE: 5798FAX vs V6R1 -- MIDRANGE-L

Subject: RE: 5798FAX vs V6R1
From: rob@xxxxxxxxx
Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2008 09:03:30 -0500
List-archive: <http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l>
List-help: <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=help>
List-id: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion <midrange-l.midrange.com>
List-post: <mailto:midrange-l@midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

Based on the previous should I recommend that IBM not install the commands
in QSYS, but instead install the commands in QUSRSYS?

Would anyone using 5798FAX have an issue with that?

Rob Berendt

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

Follow-Ups:

RE: 5798FAX vs V6R1 , rob

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.