RE: Converting from CLP to CLLE

["Jim Wiant" <Jim.Wiant@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Like Scott indicated, watch the commitment scope boundaries and
activation groups.
There's differences in the defaults between CL and CLLE, and it's
stuffed us up before.

James P. Wiant
Testing Coordinator
Foodstuffs, Auckland, Ltd.
60 Roma Road
Mt Roskill
Auckland, New Zealand 1041
09-621-0774
jim.wiant@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
 


 
 
Quality is everyone's responsibility
W. Edwards Deming


-----Original Message-----
From: midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Roger Harman
Sent: Tuesday, 13 January 2009 11:48
To: midrange-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Converting from CLP to CLLE

The override scop issues have been pretty much dealt with over the last
few years.  We're probably OK there and also, I'm hoping, with any AG
issues as we already have a mix of OPM & ILE RPG's in job streams.

I was contemplating changing the types and rolling them in as they get
recompiled.  Not quite brave enough to do a wholesale rip & replace.



> > > stephenrichter@xxxxxxxxx 01/12/2009 2:20:24 PM >>>
when calling an OPM program from CLLE, you have to change the
overrides to ovrscope(*job) and dltovr lvl(*job).


On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 4:43 PM, Roger Harman <RHarman@xxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
> Just wondering what ramifications there are or stumbling blocks people
> have encountered in switching from compiling CL programs from OPM
(CLP)
> to ILE (CLLE).
>
> Is it worth the effort?  Problems in the transition where there is a
mix
> of OPM CL's & RPG's in the job stream?
>
> Thanks.
> --
> This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion (MIDRANGE-L) mailing
list
> To post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
> visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l
> or email: MIDRANGE-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
> at http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l.