Re: Looking for a faster CPYF -- MIDRANGE-L

Subject: Re: Looking for a faster CPYF
From: rob@xxxxxxxxx
Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2009 10:49:29 -0500
List-archive: <http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l>
List-help: <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=help>
List-id: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion <midrange-l.midrange.com>
List-post: <mailto:midrange-l@midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

<snip>
automatically removing LF members for the copy and readding afterwards.
</snip>
Is this truly faster? So, sure, the CPYF command may be done but are the
logicals unusable for a long period afterwards because there are system
tasks like QDBSRV.. at the bottom of the WRKACTJOB rebuilding the indexes?

Rob Berendt

Follow-Ups:

RE: Looking for a faster CPYF , Elvis Budimlic
Re: Looking for a faster CPYF , Larry Bolhuis

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2026 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.