not sure i agree with the 1988 AS400 could not run IBM i, IBM i is just
the latest version of OS 400, and the system has always supported OS 400.
I couldn't run windows XP on a PC that supported windows 3.1, But it
doesn't make it a different machine because there were upgrade to
technology in between.







jde iSeries schreef:
I will stop calling it an AS/400 when . . . [ fill in the blank ]What
will
it take for you to stop calling it an AS/400? at what architectural
change?
[When will I stop calling myself jde.iseries? ]
I am fully aware that a significant percentage of IBM insiders and IBM i
users still call it the AS400


The 1988 AS400 could not run IBM i, AIX, Linux, nor Windows on IXS or
IXA.






This thread ...

Follow-Ups:
Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2026 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.