RE: Affect of changing sysval QPWDEXPITV -- MIDRANGE-L

Subject: RE: Affect of changing sysval QPWDEXPITV
From: rob@xxxxxxxxx
Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2009 12:35:36 -0500
List-archive: <http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l>
List-help: <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=help>
List-id: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion <midrange-l.midrange.com>
List-post: <mailto:midrange-l@midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

No. QSECOFR should expire just like everyone else. For example, if I
always log in as ROB (who has all of the authority classes) and the last
person who used QSECOFR was laid off 5 years ago and I haven't changed the
password since then I may be exposing myself.

The reports should tell you who has a password expiration interval of
*NONE. Those of the Q persuasion, in general, I wouldn't mess with.

Rob Berendt

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.