RE: v6 of HMC was: LPAR - HMC/FSP vs. R/LPAR vs. APRM vs. ? -- MIDRANGE-L

Subject: RE: v6 of HMC was: LPAR - HMC/FSP vs. R/LPAR vs. APRM vs. ?
From: rob@xxxxxxxxx
Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2009 11:53:29 -0500
List-archive: <http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l>
List-help: <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=help>
List-id: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion <midrange-l.midrange.com>
List-post: <mailto:midrange-l@midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

AFAIK HMC is dependent on firmware level. If the hardware is supported by
the firmware level then it should be supported by the level of HMC.

For Power 5 the minimum level of firmware supported by V7 R3.4.0 of HMC is
SF240_299.
For Power 6 it's dependent on the platform. Our MMA uses different
firmware than our M25's.
310_048 and higher
320_031 and higher
330_018 and higher
340_039 and higher

You can see all of this here
https://www14.software.ibm.com/webapp/set2/sas/f/hmc/home.html

http://wiki.midrange.com/index.php/HMC_Operations#How_to_view_Firmware_Levels

Rob Berendt

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2025 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.