On 27-Feb-09, at 10:13 AM, midrange-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
... Unfortunately, it hasn't
evolved quickly or far enough and, if I am to believe people I have
worked with that were on the original ILE team at IBM, that could go
down to a single management decision back in the mid-1990s on how far
to take the language. ...
You still seem to be wrestling with this so let me spell it out as
simply as I can Steve.
The above remark was made by a person who:
a) Did not work at IBM
b) Was not party to _any_ discussions on the future of ILE and RPG and
c) Has a product to sell.
On the other hand Hans and I were:
A) Both working for IBM during the period in question.
B) Were both heavily involved in many many architectural discussions
on RPG and ILE.
C) Hans was a lead architect/developer on the RPG IV compiler
D) In addition to my work in Toronto I spent 8 months on assignment
on Rochester working with the ILE architecture team.
Don't you think that one of us would have heard at least a hint of
this "single management decision"?
We didn't - there wasn't one - end of story.
Jon Paris
www.Partner400.com
www.SystemiDeveloper.com
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2025 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact
[javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.