What about it? Would you be ok with "killing" trees if it took less energy to make paper?
-----Original Message-----
From: midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Tim Gornall
Sent: Wednesday, March 04, 2009 12:00 PM
To: midrange-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: System i Network ProVIP (no "as400" content)
Give me a break Trevor! What about the energy it takes to harvest, transport, manufacture, print, transport, recycle, etc?
------------------------------
message: 8
date: Wed, 04 Mar 2009 12:29:24 -0500
from: Trevor Perry <trevor@xxxxxxxxxx>
subject: Re: System i Network ProVIP (was Re: Reading XML with an RPG
program)
Trees that are 'killed' for paper are a renewable resource - there are no wasted trees for paper. No rainforests are disappearing because you get your News in real life.
It is amazing what FUD consumers will believe. And you guys are programmers
- you shouldn't be sucked into that so easy!
On 3/4/09 9:55 AM, "lgoodbar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <lgoodbar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
Curious: is the email (digital) subscription a PDF? We receive the
dead tree version.
*************
--
This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion (MIDRANGE-L) mailing list To post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit:
http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l
or email: MIDRANGE-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives at
http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l.
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.