My solution was very similar to the steps below.

Date: Mon, 9 Mar 2009 16:50:08 -0500
From: midrange-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To: midrange-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: multiple object links from the CPYFRMIMPF command

Personally, I prefer to use 'find' instead of 'ls' -- that way you get
the path information as well as the filename.

Did you wind up with a solution like this? (This is off the top of my
head, untested...)

PGM

DCL VAR(&EOF) TYPE(*LGL) VALUE('0')
DCLF FILE(FILELIST)

/* Create a file in QTEMP to receive the directory listing */

DLTF FILE(QTEMP/FILELIST)
MONMSG CPF2105
CRTPF FILE(QTEMP/FILELIST) RCDLEN(1000)


/* List IFS files to QTEMP/FILELIST */
/* change "/home/klemscot" to the IFS dir in question */

OVRDBF FILE(STDOUT) TOFILE(QTEMP/FILELIST)
STRQSH CMD('find /home/klemscot')
DLTOVR FILE(STDOUT)


/* Read list of files from QTEMP/FILELIST and run CPYFRMIMPF */

DOWHILE (&EOF *EQ '0')

RCVF
MONMSG CPF0864 EXEC(CHGVAR VAR(&EOF) VALUE('1'))

IF (&EOF *EQ '0') DO
CPYFRMIMPF FROMSTMF(&FILELIST) TOFILE(MYLIB/MYFILE) +
RCDDLM(*ALL)
ENDDO

ENDDO

ENDPGM




Dan Rasch wrote:
Yes, the ls command was easier and probably alot more stable.

Already running . . . .

To: midrange-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: multiple object links from the CPYFRMIMPF command
From: rob@xxxxxxxxx
Date: Mon, 9 Mar 2009 16:11:08 -0400

Ow do I hurt! Thanks Scott for the thorough explanation.
Yes, I recommend the IFS api's or the ls to the database file and process
those rows with something more "traditional".

All this fun and I've opened up 5 new pmr's today and updated a couple.

Rob Berendt
--
Group Dekko Services, LLC
Dept 01.073
Dock 108
6928N 400E
Kendallville, IN 46755
http://www.dekko.com





From:
Scott Klement <midrange-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To:
Midrange Systems Technical Discussion <midrange-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date:
03/09/2009 03:07 PM
Subject:
Re: multiple object links from the CPYFRMIMPF command
Sent by:
midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx





rob@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
I suppose if you get really good at this you can figure out how to do
something like
ls '/home/drasch' || system CPYFRMIMPF ...
and pipe the output directly into CPYFRMIMPF but I only know enough to
send you on a wild goose chase.
To pipe the output somewhere, you'd have to use a single pipe.

ls '/home/drasch' | system CPYFRMIMPF ...

the double-pipe you used would only run the "system" command if the "ls"
command ended in error. :) (I know that's not what you were going for)

The big problem with this scenario is that CPYFRMIMPF isn't a Unix
command and doesn't read STDIN looking for a list of filenames... You
have to specify the filename in the FROMSTMF parameter, not pipe it to
STDIN...

If you really wanted a (poor performing) way of doing the whole shebang
from QShell, you could use the "find" utility. "find" has the
capability of running a command for every file that matches a given
pattern. For example (this should be all one line -- though I'm sure
the e-mail software will wrap it):

find /home/klemscot -name '*.csv' -exec system "cpyfrmimpf
fromstmf('{}') tofile(mylib/myfile) rcddlm(*all)" \;


This tells the 'find' utility to search the /home/klemscot folder of the
IFS. It will find all files that match the pattern *.csv (make sure
that's in quotes, as I have it above, otherwise QShell will treat the *
as a special character and you'll have anarchy). The -exec parameter
tells it to execute a command for every file that it finds.

in this case, it executes the QShell "system" command, which runs a CL
command. The \; signals the end of the command you want the -exec
switch to run.

The {} characters in the middle of the command string will be replaced
with the filename that the "find" utility finds. It will submit a new
job for each file that it finds, so if there are many that match the
wildcard, this will perform poorly. If you only expect one or two that
match, this is probably okay.

Personally, I wouldn't do it this way because of the performance.
Another problem with this approach is error handling... it's hard to do
a good job of handling errors that might occur on the CPYFRMIMPF command.

Then, there's the fact that you'll have to understand Unix shell
scripting well enough to write/maintain the code... Let's use Rob's
example (since I don't think Rob will be offended if I pick on him)

This was his first example:

system dspf /rob/duh.txt

This is perfectly valid as far as Qshell is concerned. But it leaves
you with "dspf /rob/duh.txt" being passed to the native command-line.
You can't have a / character in a native command line unless it's put in
quotes... quotes is where the headaches will start.

Rob's second example:

system dspf '/rob/duh.txt'

Qshell will assume those quotes are meant for Qshell, not to be passed
to the native command. The single quotes are "strong quotes" and mean
that the contents inside them are not to be taken as special characters.
So QShell will pass /rob/duh.txt directly to the native command
interpreter without trying to interpret them further -- which is okay,
except that Qshell will strip the single quotes off of the command first
-- so we're right back to the first error. This is what gets passed to
QCMD: dspf /rob/duh.txt

Back to square one, / being in the command without quotes surrounding
it. Whenever you go through multiple command interpreters (both QShell
and QCMD in this case) things get ugly like this.

Rob's next example:

system DSPF STMF('/rob/duh.txt')

Both the single quotes, and the parenthesis here will be interpreted as
special characters by QShell. The parenthesis aren't in a valid place
for QShell to use them, so you get the "token not expected". If they
had been in the right place for Qshell, you'd have the same problem as
before... the quotes would be stripped before sending it to QCMD.

The solution is easy, just put double quotes around the whole thing.
Then QShell won't try to do any special interpretation of the single
quotes or the parenthesis...

system "DSPF STMF('/rob/duh.txt')"

This is now syntactically legal... but now you have a new problem! DSPF
is an interactive 5250 command, and QShell submits a background job (BCI
job) to run the command. So it'll fail with "DSPF not allowed in this
setting" since you can't run DSPF in a batch job.

However, if you used CPYFRMIMPF or another command that's allowed in
batch, this syntax would work... If you followed all of that, you'll
see why I used the syntax that I did in the "find" example. But the
next person to maintain your code may not understand all of this.

So that, plus performance, etc, etc, is why I'd recommend using the IFS
APIs or having QShell output to a file, then read the file from CL.
It's just easier...

this is getting too long, so I'll stop here.
--
This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion (MIDRANGE-L) mailing
list
To post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l
or email: MIDRANGE-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
at http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l.



--
This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion (MIDRANGE-L) mailing list
To post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l
or email: MIDRANGE-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
at http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l.


_________________________________________________________________
Windows Live™ Groups: Create an online spot for your favorite groups to meet.
http://windowslive.com/online/groups?ocid=TXT_TAGLM_WL_groups_032009

--
This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion (MIDRANGE-L) mailing list
To post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l
or email: MIDRANGE-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
at http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l.


_________________________________________________________________
Hotmail® is up to 70% faster. Now good news travels really fast.
http://windowslive.com/online/hotmail?ocid=TXT_TAGLM_WL_HM_70faster_032009

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.