Re: 5746 LTO4 Ultrium drive -- MIDRANGE-L

Subject: Re: 5746 LTO4 Ultrium drive
From: Bill <brobins3d@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 19 Jun 2009 15:03:23 -0700
List-archive: <http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l>
List-help: <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=help>
List-id: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion <midrange-l.midrange.com>
List-post: <mailto:midrange-l@midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

Kirk Goins wrote:

The Internal LTOs will scream compared to the QICs. Also what we are doing for those clients that don't need the LTO4 capacity is suggesting they use LTO3 media. It's half the cost of the LTO4 media and still has enough capacity for single tape full saves.

Just be aware that if you have created programs that contain InzTap commands, you'll have to specify to use *CtgType formatting instead of the command default of *DevType.

Bill

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

Follow-Ups:

Re: 5746 LTO4 Ultrium drive , Roger Harman

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2025 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.