RE: Commitment Control (was: Modernizing applications (was: Explaining single level store tonon ipeople)) -- MIDRANGE-L

Subject: RE: Commitment Control (was: Modernizing applications (was: Explaining single level store tonon ipeople))
From: rob@xxxxxxxxx
Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2009 09:33:43 -0400
List-archive: <http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l>
List-help: <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=help>
List-id: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion <midrange-l.midrange.com>
List-post: <mailto:midrange-l@midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

<snip>
Nearly as bad as the people who ignore the "1 object not saved" message on
the basis that "it's only 1 object, right ?"
</snip>

I always asked them if I could just delete that object then. Normally it
was the item master or some such thing. For some reason they seemed
reluctant.

Rob Berendt

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2026 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.