Re: RGZPFM vs RSTOBJ -- MIDRANGE-L

Subject: Re: RGZPFM vs RSTOBJ
From: rob@xxxxxxxxx
Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2009 07:55:54 -0400
List-archive: <http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l>
List-help: <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=help>
List-id: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion <midrange-l.midrange.com>
List-post: <mailto:midrange-l@midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

RTM
http://publib.boulder.ibm.com/infocenter/iseries/v6r1m0/topic/dbp/rbaforeorgtypes.htm
Really - RTM.

For many of you using the concurrent option will not be an option because
you are loathe to use any useful tools on your data - like journalling.
It's only been around for a decade or so therefore it must be still buggy.

See also "... requires exclusive use for only a few seconds..." in the
above link.

For more detail
http://publib.boulder.ibm.com/infocenter/iseries/v6r1m0/topic/dbp/rbafomngprgz.htm

Rob Berendt

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

Follow-Ups:

RE: RGZPFM vs RSTOBJ , Evan Harris

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.