Re: SQL Sequence data area object structure? -- MIDRANGE-L

Subject: Re: SQL Sequence data area object structure?
From: CRPence <CRPbottle@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 02 Nov 2009 18:43:48 -0800
List-archive: <http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l>
List-help: <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=help>
List-id: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion <midrange-l.midrange.com>
List-post: <mailto:midrange-l@midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

David Gibbs wrote:

<<SNIP>> Oddly enough ... I noticed that, if you alter the
sequence to turn OFF the cache, the maximum assigned value in the
SYSSEQUENCES table does *not* get fixed ... and the next value
generated by the sequence will be based off the last cached
value.

The "Notes" for "Altering a sequence" in the following link for the SQL ALTER SEQUENCE documentation may explain the effect on the MAXASSIGNEDVAL, per "All the cached values are lost when a sequence is altered."?:
http://publib.boulder.ibm.com/infocenter/iseries/v6r1m0/topic/db2/rbafzasequence.htm

Regards, Chuck

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.