RE: QZDASOINIT prestart job entry Max Jobs and Uses -- MIDRANGE-L

Subject: RE: QZDASOINIT prestart job entry Max Jobs and Uses
From: "Dennis Lovelady" <iseries@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2009 14:53:08 -0500
List-archive: <http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l>
List-help: <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=help>
List-id: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion <midrange-l.midrange.com>
List-post: <mailto:midrange-l@midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

The fact that QZDASOINIT is taking 60% doesn't mean there's a problem.

I would also point out that reducing a job's priority (higher RUNPTY number)
does not make it need (and therefore use) more CPU. It just lessens the
chance that the changed job will have a negative impact on other jobs
running on the system.

Regards,

Dennis Lovelady
http://www.linkedin.com/in/dennislovelady
--
... Had this been an actual emergency, we would have fled in terror, and you
would not have been informed.

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2025 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.