RE: QZDASOINIT prestart job entry Max Jobs and Uses -- MIDRANGE-L

Subject: RE: QZDASOINIT prestart job entry Max Jobs and Uses
From: "Dennis Lovelady" <iseries@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2009 14:53:08 -0500
List-archive: <http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l>
List-help: <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=help>
List-id: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion <midrange-l.midrange.com>
List-post: <mailto:midrange-l@midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

The fact that QZDASOINIT is taking 60% doesn't mean there's a problem.

I would also point out that reducing a job's priority (higher RUNPTY number)
does not make it need (and therefore use) more CPU. It just lessens the
chance that the changed job will have a negative impact on other jobs
running on the system.

Regards,

Dennis Lovelady
http://www.linkedin.com/in/dennislovelady
--
... Had this been an actual emergency, we would have fled in terror, and you
would not have been informed.

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2026 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.