RE: Clean joblog

["M. Lazarus" <mlazarus@xxxxxxxx>]

Rob,

 That wouldn't matter anyway.  Even if you have a global MONMSG, a 
specific MONMSG after the offending statement will take precedence of 
the global monitor.

 -mark


At 12/21/09 11:20 AM, you wrote:
> Double checked, no global monmsg.  Yes the detail monmsg is for CPF2103,
> just wanted to post the gist.
>
>
> Rob Berendt
> --
> Group Dekko Services, LLC
> Dept 01.073
> Dock 108
> 6928N 400E
> Kendallville, IN 46755
> http://www.dekko.com
>
>
>
>
>
> From:   "Dennis Lovelady" <iseries@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> To:     "'Midrange Systems Technical Discussion'"
> <midrange-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Date:   12/21/2009 11:17 AM
> Subject:        RE: Clean joblog
> Sent by:        midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx
>
>
>
> > Yes.  I have
> > - command
> > - monmsg
> > - rcvmsg
> > consecutively in the same program.
>
> Forgive me, but the MONMSG named above is for CPF2103, right?  You don't
> have a more global MONMSG that's masking your effort, do you?
>
> Dennis Lovelady
> http://www.linkedin.com/in/dennislovelady